Austin Walker explains why he signed the IGF jurors' AI statement
Austin Walker, an IGF juror, publishes the two internal posts he wrote during judging, which he says were prompted by games he loved that turned out to use AI. He says the jurors' deliberation grew out of the conversation around House House's Big Walk but was never about one game, and that the studios' Steam pages carried no disclosure because Steam's rules differ from the IGF's.
Walker stresses the statement had 19 signatories among roughly 50 jurors, that others privately agreed but did not sign, and that many fundamentally disagreed. He asks readers not to treat it as a majority view or an IGF position, and calls it one group's commitment at one moment.
CounterpointThe jurors who opposed the statement, as Walker himself notes, would argue that a blanket refusal to vote for any game that used AI penalises veteran developers whose use was limited and who followed the disclosure rules they were given.
Previously: Nineteen IGF jurors said they would not vote for any game using generative AI and called on the festival to ban such games. — Tuesday November 10 edition.