Nineteen IGF jurors say they won't vote for any game that used generative AI
A group of 19 named jurors for the 2027 Independent Games Festival, among them Austin Walker, Sam Barlow and Lena Raine, have issued a statement saying they will not vote for any game that used generative AI in any capacity. They draw no line between art, sound and code, arguing that programming is a creative discipline and that the harms (ecological, economic, psychological and to labour) do not depend on what is generated. The statement cites a significant rise in AI-assisted submissions and urges the IGF to adopt a strong anti-AI policy that bars such games in future years.
The jurors stress that they do not speak for the IGF or for all jurors. Some colleagues disagreed, and others feared professional blowback if they signed. IGF leadership approved the release of the statement but has not adopted its position, and Aftermath's Luke Plunkett notes that the rise in AI use is visible across the industry this year.
CounterpointDevelopers and executives who defend AI tooling, the pro-AI camp in the Kenney and Sweeney exchange among them, would say a blanket ban on code assistance penalises small teams, and that the IGF's own rules leave jurors free to vote on taste. Some of the festival's other jurors had reservations about the statement itself.
Previously: The Kenney and Tim Sweeney exchange had put the pro- and anti-AI camps in direct conflict, with Steam survey data cutting both ways. — Saturday November 7 edition.