Epic goes AI-first on a Disney shooter as Blizzard courts old goodwill
Gaming Editorial
Counterpoint: Epic and other AI-tool advocates would say the tools speed up work that developers still direct, as Jones's statement puts it, and that the reported mandate may be garbled or aspirational. Tim Sweeney has argued that developers should be free to use AI without being stigmatised.
Previously: On 2026-10-09 Aftermath questioned an AI-assisted Pride and Prejudice platform in Fortnite, against Stephenson's claim that AI augments creativity. — Friday October 9 edition.
Counterpoint: Developers and publishers who use generative tools would say a distinction exists between rule-based procedural generation, which Adams practises, and AI models, and that studios should judge the latter on results. Epic is one such company, as covered above.
Previously: On 2026-10-09 Aftermath questioned an AI-assisted Pride and Prejudice platform in Fortnite, against Stephenson's claim that AI augments creativity. — Friday October 9 edition.
Counterpoint: Fans who see Star Wars as primarily a film and TV saga might say games cannot offset weakness in its core storytelling. Others would note that Disney, the licensor Plunkett criticises, also approves these games.
Counterpoint: The cynical reading, which Woo acknowledges, is that nothing has changed and each legacy-game decision simply passed a cost-benefit test. Fans of Diablo 3 would add that the neglect of that game undercuts the 'never give up on a game' claim.